March 8, 2019
By Steve Blumenthal

“To refer to a personal taste of mine, I’m going to buy hamburgers the rest of my life.
When hamburgers go down in price, we sing the ‘Hallelujah Chorus’ in the Buffett household.
When hamburgers go up in price, we weep.
For most people, it’s the same with everything in life they will be buying — except stocks.
When stocks go down and you can get more for your money, people don’t like them anymore.”

Warren Buffett, Fortune, December 2010

The goal of every investment portfolio is to capture growth while preserving capital, yet these two goals are at odds with each other. Taking on too much risk to increase returns (growth) risks large losses. Being too conservative to prevent loss (preserving capital) stymies growth. The trick is to find the right balance and know when to play more offense than defense or more defense than offense.

That’s where understanding equity market valuations and what they tell us about coming returns comes into play. Your initial starting conditions matter and can serve as a guide to help you know how to best position your portfolio for the period immediately ahead.

Today, let’s take a look at our initial starting investment conditions. We’ll look at the most current valuations and see what they are telling us about coming 3-, 5-, 7-, 10- and 12-year returns. And we’ll look at what they are telling us about the level of risk.

To set the stage, it is important to note that markets go through periods of bull and bear market cycles. We love bull markets and loath bear markets. Both happen. Here is a look at the bull and bear market secular trends since 1900. Annualized returns are noted in each period.

Next is a look at the DJIA over the same period of time as the chart above. From 1966 to 1982, the DJIA lost 1.5% per year before factoring in inflation. Sixteen years averaging -1.5% per year is a long and painful run. Compounding investor pain were the inflation pressures in the 1970’s and early 1980’s. My personal view is that the coming restructuring of the debt will lead to a period of high interest rates and higher inflation. That’s not currently factored into the 2.65% 10-year Treasury yield we see today.

GMO’s Jeremy Grantham, famous for calling the last two bubbles, was on CNBC this week saying,

“Don’t expect a massive drop to signal the end of the longest bull market in history.  This will be limping along; three steps down, two steps back. It’s not a typical experience.  I was really hoping there would be a magnificent bubble ending to this, as there had been to the three great recent experiences,” he said. “It doesn’t look like it will and, therefore, you’re going to have a decline of a different nature.”

He may be right.  With valuations high and the bull market aged, the point I’m hitting hard is that risk is high and coming returns will be low. This year, next year? Don’t know. Over the coming five to 12 years, I think the data you’ll find below compelling.

Game Plan

Now, if you are in your 20’s or 30’s, then simply find a good ETF that gives you the market at low cost, keep adding money every year and dollar cost average for the next 30 years. When the next recession resets valuations, add more, don’t worry and stick to the plan. However, if you are a pre-retiree or retiree, like me, unfortunately, we just don’t have the same time runway and can’t afford to wait the years it will take to overcome another 50% loss on our retirement savings. For us, I suggest a more adaptive investment approach. More defense than offense today. More offense than defense after asset prices reset lower. The next recession will likely create that opportunity.

It can take time to recover from a bear market. Especially when inflation is factored in. For example, imagine you are 50, 60 or 70 years old and it is December 1999, and you were planning to retire in the next 10 to 15 years. Look at the next chart and observe how long it took, after inflation, to get back to even. And inflation matters, since we need to grow our money in order to buy things. Our initial starting conditions matter. It took 14 to 18 years to recover from the two recessionary-driven market meltdowns that occurred. I’m turning 58 in a few short weeks. Age 58 to age 72 is a long gap with zero gain.

Here is how to read the next chart:

• The pink zone in the following chart is the period of time spent underwater.
• The DJIA is the green line, the S&P 500 Index is the blue line and the NASDAQ is the red line.
• The “hamburgers” were expensively priced in 1999, suggesting that more defense than offense was the better game plan. I argue the same is true today.

Note the gray bars in the chart. They were the two recessions and they reset valuations and improved initial starting conditions. Recessions tend to clean house and create outstanding investment opportunities. Cheaper hamburgers.  You can buy much more for your money.

Should we play more offense than defense or more defense than offense? Valuations can help. Grab a coffee, find your favorite chair, and read on. You’ll find a number of different valuation metrics and compelling coming return data. I hope you find this information helpful as you map your offense/defense game plan for the period ahead. I conclude today’s OMR with a story about Alexander Hamilton, our first Treasury Secretary, the NYSE and a really great day.

♦ If you are not signed up to receive my weekly On My Radar e-newsletter, you can subscribe here. ♦

Included in this week’s On My Radar:

• Stock Markets – Valuations and Coming Returns
• Global Recession Update
• Trade Signals – Investor Sentiment is Too Bullish, Recession Watch Update
• Personal Note – Alexander Hamilton and the New York Stock Exchange

---

Stock Markets – Valuations and Coming Returns

“Your and my clients are expecting 10% forward returns; however, due to extremely
high valuations they are likely to get 0% to 2%. Trouble spots?
There are many. It is the bubble in the bond market that has me most concerned.”

Steve Blumenthal, OMR, February 2018

Make that the corporate bond market. And it is going to be epic. But more on that opportunity in another letter, this week is about valuations and coming returns. So put your quant hat on and let’s get geeky…

Following are a number of different valuation charts, but you should be able to read through this section quickly. I do try my best to hit the high points and summarize “bottom line” what each means. Keep Buffett’s quote on hamburgers in the back of your mind as you’ll find consistency in the data.

Bottom line: The markets, by most measures, are expensively priced.

Chart 1: Compares the Shiller P/E Ratio (or PE10) vs. History

• Note the yellow dot vs. the 1929 and 2007 market peaks.
• The dotted orange line marks the tech bubble period.
• The market is currently in the 95^th percentile of all P/E readings since 1900.

My favorite valuation chart is median P/E. I like it because median P/E is the middle out of all the stocks in the S&P 500 Index. This method tends to eliminate one-time accounting gimmicks, etc. I also like it because we can then compare where we are valuation-wise vs. where we have been historically and then look at that historical data to see how the market did 10 years later. Meaning, putting real life performance stats to Buffett’s hamburger theory. Let’s look at Chart 2.

Chart 2: S&P 500 Index Median P/E

• Note the red “We are here” annotation. It is lower than it was in mid-2018 but remains higher than it was in 2007 and higher than the late 1990s and early to mid-2000s.
• Note the few times since 1964 where the market was this overvalued.
• Take a look at the red arrow and red circle at the bottom of the chart.
  • A good entry price (fairly valued “hamburgers”) is when median P/E drops to the dotted green line. That is the 55-year average median P/E. At the end of February 2019, median P/E was at 22.2. It would have to decline to 17.2 to move back to that 55-year average. Look for stocks to drop to 2152.41 to be at a level where the “hamburgers” would be considered “Fair Value.” That would require the market to drop by 22.7% from February’s S&P 500 Index closing level of 2784.49.
  • Today, March 8, 2019, the S&P 500 is at 2730.30.
  • Absent recession, 2152.41 is probable in my view. With recession, I’d expect the market to move to the “undervalued” level or 1489.70 on the S&P 500 Index (red circle, bottom section of chart).
  • I also like how the data process considers levels of both “overvalued” and “undervalued.” Perhaps that is why the market has had so much trouble at the 2800 level.
  • Bottom line: set your sites on the green dotted “Fair Value” line. More defense than offense until this metric improves.

When I posted this chart in February 2018, median P/E stood at 26.8 and the S&P 500 Index was at 2823.81. Our initial starting conditions and valuations do matter!

I mentioned that valuations are a great long-term predictor of the annualized returns we’re likely to get. Let’s look at that in this next chart.

Chart 3: What Median P/E Tells Us about Forward 10-year Returns

When valuations are high, forward returns are low. We have no idea as to the next one to two years, but we have a really good idea about the coming 10 years.

Here is a look at the data (1926 to December 31, 2014) and how to read it:

• Median P/E was sorted into five quintiles that ranged from lowest median P/E readings to highest. Quintile 1 is the lowest 20% of all month-end median P/E and quintile 5 is the highest incidences.
• Then what happened? Next to each quintile is the annualized return data. Shown is the annualized nominal returns (before factoring inflation) achieved 10 years later.
• Today, we remain in quintile 5.
• Bottom line: The stock market is richly priced, expect forward returns to be low.

Chart 4: Shiller P/E Currently 29.84

• Data is from 1880 to present.
• The Shiller P/E is down from its 2018 high in the low to mid-30s, but still as high as the 1929 “Black Tuesday” peak.
• It still remains higher than any other time with the exception of the 2000 tech bubble.

Chart 5: What Shiller P/E can tell us about coming 10-year real (inflation adjusted) total returns

Here’s how to read the next chart:

• We are in the highest quintile of all monthly valuation numbers since 1880 (see red “we are here” arrow).
• The chart groups Shiller PE into quintiles (lowest PE’s on the left, highest PE’s on the right) and plots the average 10-year annualized real total returns that was achieved.
• The average P/E for each quintile is shown at the bottom of each blue bar.
• Bottom line: you get much more return on your money when PE’s are lowest (green “we’d be better off here” arrow) vs. when PE’s are highest (red “we are here” arrow). Expect 2.4% real annualized returns over the coming 10 years (and likely a bumpy road on the way to those low returns).

Chart 6: Stocks as a Percentage of Household Equity vs. Subsequent Rolling S&P 500 Index Total Returns

Here’s how to read the next chart:

• Blue line tracks the percentage of household financial assets that are allocated to equities. The dotted black line is important. It tracks/plots the returns that were achieved 10 years later.
• The logic is that when investors are heavily invested into stocks, there is less buying power left to drive prices higher.  When they are under invested, there is money available to buy stocks.  More buyers than sellers drives prices higher.
• The red boxes and lines mark certain dates when ownership was high and the arrows point to the returns that were forecast based on the percentage investors had in equities.
• For example, note 2000 and the forecast return of -3% per year for 10 years. The dotted black line shows what the actual return turned out to be. The actual return from 2000 to 2009 came in slightly better at -2% but you get the point.
• Now, take a look at the green boxes. Same concept but better initial conditions. It’s about supply and demand and available capital.  Low equity percentage ownership means that there is more money available to buy stocks. And the subsequent returns tell the story.
• Simply, periods of high stock ownership correlate with lower subsequent returns and low stock ownership correlates with higher subsequent returns.
  • As Sir John Templeton said, “The secret to my success is I buy when everyone else is selling and I sell when everyone else is buying.” This chart is a demonstration of Sir John’s axiom.
• Finally, note how closely the dotted black line (the plotting of the actual return over a rolling 10-year period) closely tracks the blue line (percentage of stock ownership).  We geeks look at something called a correlation coefficient to see how closely one thing relates to another. Since 1951, the correlation is 0.89. 1.0 is a perfect correlation. 0.89 is very high and with data back to 1951, it is a number not to be ignored.
• Bottom line: As of December 31, 2018, the potential return over the coming 10 years improved from about 1% to 3% before inflation. Better but not so good.

Chart 7: GMO’s 7-Year Real Return Forecast

• I added the red arrows for emphasis.
• Forecasting -3.7% for equities and -0.80% for U.S. bonds over the coming seven years.
• I have followed GMO’s monthly forecast updates since the late 1990s. You can learn more about how they calculate their forecast at gmo.com.
• Bottom line: Ugh! Remain patient. More defense than offense.

Chart 8: Other Valuation Measures

One of my favorites is Price to Sales.  It’s near a record high.  Someone might comment that I’m cherry picking just a few metrics and not showing, for example, PE based on Wall Streets 2019 earnings estimates.  Well, here is a full list of many different way to measure the markets valuation level.  Even Forward PE is in the red zone at “Moderately Overvalued.”  And if you follow Wall Street analyst earnings closely, you know that Wall Street is always bullish and those numbers start out with big expected earnings gains and they almost always trend lower as the year progresses.  No my go to.  Here is a detailed look across the spectrum of different valuation methods.

• Bottom line: Most valuation metrics reflect a richly priced “overvalued” market.

Chart 9: The Buffett Indicator — Corporate Equities-to-GDP

Warren Buffett once said that looking at the total valuation of corporate equities relative to GDP (what a country produces) is his favorite valuation metric.

Here is how to read the next chart:

• This indicator takes the value of corporate equities from the Fed’s Quarterly Z.1 Balance Sheet and compares it to U.S. Gross Domestic Product.
• Think of the U.S. as one big business and it produces a number. In this case, GDP is used.
• If your business produced $1 million and the value of all your outstanding shares times your current stock price was $2.38 million, the value of your business would be worth 138% more than what you produced.
• Think of it just as a baseline measure. You can then compare that baseline measure to points in time (history) and see just how richly priced you are relative to any point in time.
• If I’m going to buy your stock, am I paying a lot or getting a good deal? Of course, that depends on your ability to grow your sales; I can estimate that…but I want to see how much I’m paying for your shares relative to your business growth over time.  Expensive hamburgers or inexpensive?
• So think of all the stocks in the U.S. compared to where they have been historically. Since 1990, GDP has averaged around 3%. I suspect over time, as it has in the past, it will fluctuate between 2% and 4% with a few select periods above and below those numbers. See chart on GDP since 1990 here.  So this is a pretty stable way of seeing how expensively priced or inexpensively priced the stock market is at any point in time.

Bottom line: While slightly off from recent highs, the “Buffett Indicator” remains at the second highest level since 1950. We are not getting a lot of hamburger meat for our money.  Better to wait for opportunities similar to what presented in 2002 and 2008/09.

Chart 10: Hussman 12-Year Forward Returns

Here is how you read the next chart:

From John Hussman’s March 2019 post:

The chart below shows our MAPE (Margin-Adjusted P/E) on an inverted log scale (left) along with the actual subsequent S&P 500 average annual total return over the subsequent 12-year horizon. While the December decline briefly pushed our expectation for 12-year S&P 500 total returns above zero, the recent advance has driven that expected return back to negative levels, as indicated by the arrow at the lower right.

As I’ve often observed, the key feature of bubbles like 2000, 2007 and today is that, by the market peak, actual S&P 500 total returns over the most recent 12-year period outpace the return that one would have anticipated on the basis of valuations 12 years earlier. This is not an indication that valuations have failed, but rather an indication that prices are likely to do so.

Bottom line: Forecasting -1.25% annualized returns over the coming 12 years (see arrow bottom right).

You can read his full piece here.

Chart 11: “Normal” Valuation

What I like about this next chart is that it looks at several different valuation measures to come to what NDR terms “Normal” valuation.  (Dividends, Earnings, Cash Flow, Sales, CPI and Trend.)

Here’s how to read the chart:

• Focus in on the middle section (red “We are here” arrow). Note the current “Normal” valuation reading is above 20 and in the “overvalued” zone.
• Next look at the bottom right-hand section. It shows returns six months, one, two, three, five and 10 years later. These are not annualized returns. Returns are the % gain years later. For example, when above 20, $100,000 grew to $126,200 or up 12.62% five years later.
• Now compare that to when the “Normal” valuation reading was below -20. $100,000 grew to $164,530.
• Bottom line: Wait for a pullback to below 0 and get very aggressive when below -20.  Normal Valuation is in the “Overvalued” zone… expensively priced.

One last important point. Not only are returns greatest when valuations are lowest, risk is also lowest when valuations are lowest.  The reverse is true as you can see in the next chart.  I’m not sure most people factor that into their offense / defense thinking.  They should!

Bottom line: There are times to play more offense than defense and times to play more defense than offense. I suggest the playbook should be defensively minded today. Trade with stop-loss risk management rules firmly in place.

---

Global Recession Update

The next chart shows the NDR Global Recession Probability Model based on the Amplitude-Adjusted Composite Leading Indicators (CLIs) created by OECD for 35 countries. Each CLI contains a wide range of economic indicators, such as money supply, yield curve, building permits, consumer and business sentiment, share prices and manufacturing production. There are usually five to 10 indicators, which vary by type and weight, depending on the country, and are selected based on economic significance, cyclical behavior, and quality. The CLIs are normally released on the second Friday of each month for two months prior, or about a six-week lag. Meanwhile, the NDR Global Recession Probability Model is a forward-looking model using a two-month lead in the CLI data.

• Bottom line: A score above 70 indicates high recession risks while a score below 30 means low risks.

I shared this next chart in July last year. It showed the risk of a global recession at approximately 59%. Take a look and then look at the second chart dated February 2019. Risk has moved from 59% probability to 96%.  Since recession are only known in hindsight (after two consecutive quarters of negative growth) indicators such as NDR’s Global Recession Probability model can help us asses how much risk exposure we may want to take on.  Bottom line: We are likely in a global recession.

Global Recession Probability – June 30, 2018

Global Recession Probability – February 28, 2019

As for the U.S., the economy remains in ok shape but we are not immune to the global economy. You’ll find my favorite recession watch indicators in the Trade Signals section below. You’ll need to click on the link that will take you to Wednesday’s post. My two cents: I expect the economy to continue to slow into 2020. Risk of recession late 2019 into 2020. As an optimist, I believe we may not have to wait that long before another great buying opportunity presents to us.  For now, the weight of evidences suggest to me that more defense than offense is the play.

A lot of analysts are suggesting better returns owning emerging market equities and fixed income and that is true.  But a note of caution, EM won’t be immune to a U.S. recession, so I’d be patient and risk-minded with that exposure as well.

More offense than defense or more defense than offense – Initial starting conditions matter

In summary, wait for the hamburgers to go down and price and sing the hallelujah choirs with the Buffett household.  “When stocks go down and you can get more for your money, people don’t like them anymore.”  It is because fear replaces reason just like it did in 2002 and 2008/09.  You want to take advantage of such fear.  Valuations, stock ownership and understanding investor behavior can work to your advantage.

---

Trade Signals – Investor Sentiment is Too Bullish, Recession Watch Update

March 6, 2019
S&P 500 Index — 2,780

Notable this week:

No major changes or updates.

After having one of the strongest starts to a New Year in history, major stock indexes continue to test potential overhead resistance levels. Up nearly 20% from the Christmas Eve low, the markets remain over-extended. I previously shared the following chart highlighting the red zone. Then, investor pessimism was extremely high (which is a short-term bullish indicator for stocks) and I suggested the S&P 500 would recover from the December decline with a likely rally back to the “red zone.” It has recovered more than that and now sits with investor sentiment in extreme optimism (which is short-term bearish for stocks). I suspect we’ve reached a short-term top in equities. A logical pull-back is back to the red zone. Note the red 50-day moving average (MA) line remains below the blue 200-day MA line. One last short-term note, the red circle in the bottom right section of the chart shows something called MACD. It just turned lower, suggesting the market rally is out of gas. Given the level of extreme optimism, I suspect a correction of recent gains and with Fed support back on the table, a better buying opportunity at the 200-day MA line. A break above the black line will likely then see a test of the 2018 high. No guarantees. The economy remains late cycle, expensively priced and the bull market aged. More defense than offense.

You’ll see below that the MA trend signals remain in sell signals as does the 50-day vs. 200-day MA signal. Notable is the 13-week vs. 34-week trend signal just turned bullish. The Ned Davis Research CMG Large Cap Long/Flat Index remains in a 40% invested position but the trend is improving. Global recession risk remains high; however, I believe the key is the U.S. and current U.S. recession risk is low. The really bad stuff happens in recessions so let’s keep close watch. The recession data updates monthly – the February month-end data is below.

Click here for this week’s Trade Signals.

Important note: Not a recommendation for you to buy or sell any security.  For information purposes only.  Please talk with your advisor about needs, goals, time horizon and risk tolerances. 

---

Personal Note – Alexander Hamilton and the New York Stock Exchange

In March 1982, my father loaned me his big honkin’ 1979 yellow Lincoln Continental. I drove across Interstate 80 from Penn State to NYC. My destination was the New York Stock Exchange. The car totally fit right in on 42^nd Street, if you remember how shady that area was back then. I felt I was driving a pimp mobile. Do you remember the long hood and ornament at the front of the hood.  And yellow.  Who owns a yellow car?  After coming through the Lincoln Tunnel, I found the first parking garage I could, jumped in a cab and raced downtown to meet a man named Freddie Block. Freddie was the institutional floor broker on the New York Stock Exchange for Montgomery Securities.

I spent the day shadowing Freddie and left mesmerized by how the stock exchange functioned. Freddie would carefully hide his hand (a large customer order to buy or sell a stock) from the specialist who handled that stock. All buying and selling met at that point. His job was to get the best price for his client. He’d tell me what he was trying to do, what he would say, the questions the specialist would ask, how he’d respond… a poker game of sorts with the sole objective to get the very best price for the client. One day on the Exchange and I knew the markets were for me.

This past Wednesday afternoon, I returned to the floor to watch my friends at Syntax Advisors and my daughter, Brianna, ring the closing bell. We arrived at 1:30 pm and before we went down to the floor, a historian gave us a brief history of the Exchange.

Among many great things Alexander Hamilton did for our country, he created the first bonds. They were called the Hamilton Bonds. He had headed the first bank of the United States, which was located adjacent to the New York Stock Exchange. In the late 18th century, there was a buttonwood tree at the foot of Wall Street under which traders and speculators would gather to trade securities. The benefit was being in proximity to the bank. In 1792, traders formalized their association with the Buttonwood Agreement, which was the origin of the New York Stock Exchange (pictured above).

The idea of the agreement was to make the market more “structured” and “without the manipulative auctions,” with a commission structure. Persons signing the agreement agreed to charge each other a standard commission rate; persons not signing could still participate but would be charged a higher commission for dealing. In 1789, Wall Street was the scene of the United States’ first presidential inauguration when George Washington took the oath of office on the balcony of Federal Hall on April 30, 1789. This was also the location of the passing of the Bill of Rights. Alexander Hamilton, who was the first Treasury Secretary and “architect of the early United States financial system,” is buried in the cemetery at the top of Wall Street at Trinity Church.

We sit in a position of privilege. The world’s greatest capital markets system with the heart of the system beating in lower Manhattan at the world’s largest stock exchange, the New York Stock Exchange.

A fun day:  The following video is of a very excited team from Syntax celebrating the listing of their first ETF. Much more about Syntax in letters to come. Daughter Brianna is on the far right. Dad is on the floor just down below. Click on the picture for all the excitement. A big congratulations to Syntax Advisors’ CEO, Rory Riggs, his wife Margaret and the entire Syntax family. And a big hat tip to Mark Finn and his team at Vantage Consulting Group, the sub-advisor to the new Syntax Stratified Large Cap ETF. An exciting day and a very proud moment for dad to see Brie on the NYSC podium. I’m checking in happy.

Here are a few more shots from the NYSE floor:

I’m going to have to get next week’s letter done by early Friday morning. I’ve been looking at late business cycle profit margins and have a few thoughts on the subject to share with you. So look for that in next week’s letter. Just the sound of that must have you jumping for joy.  Profit margins… we need to get a life.  I’ll load up my computer and write on another letter on yet another plane. But no complaints.  Son Matt is in a season-ending ski event in Jackson Hole, Wyoming next Friday. He does the freestyle event (jumps and rails) and it is great fun to watch. I meet up with him next Thursday slope-side with boots clicked into skis. I’m really excited to watch Matt and his teammates compete and it looks like we’ll have some time to ski together on Saturday.

March 22 finds me in Salt Lake City presenting at the Barron’s Institutional Advisor event. The calendar remains full through May. John Mauldin and I are speaking at a large advisor/client event in Austin, Texas on April 3 and again in Dallas for a dinner presentation on April 4.  And, if you have not yet registered for the Mauldin Strategic Investment Conference, it is nearly sold out. Over 575 people have registered. The max number is 650. Please send me an email if you are interested in attending and I may be able to get you a preferred rate. It’s not inexpensive, but it is easily the best conference I attend each year.

The Mauldin Strategic Investment Conference in Dallas is on May 13-16. A strong line-up of speakers: President George W. Bush, Howard Marks, Feliz Zulauf, Carmen Reinhart, Jeffrey Sherman, Dr. Michael Roizen, Louis-Vincent Gave, Liz Ann Sonders, Bill White, Mark Yusko, Grant Williams, Lacy Hunt, George Friedman, David Rosenberg and more…  Hope to see you in Dallas.

Speaking of Rosenberg. As I was enjoying the Syntax closing bell celebration, I turned around and was excited to find my friend David Rosenberg gettign mic’ed up for a CNBC interview. I tried to catch him post and also connect with good friend Art Cashin but their exits were swift and I missed.

Have a great weekend! Thank you for reading On My Radar.

Subscribe to OMR

Best regards,
Steve

Stephen B. Blumenthal
Executive Chairman & CIO
CMG Capital Management Group, Inc.

---

If you find the On My Radar weekly research letter helpful, please tell a friend … also note the social media links below.  I often share articles and charts during the week via Twitter and LinkedIn that I feel may be worth your time.  You can follow me on Twitter @SBlumenthalCMG and on LinkedIn.

I hope you find On My Radar helpful for you and your work with your clients.  And please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions.

Stephen Blumenthal founded CMG Capital Management Group in 1992 and serves today as its Executive Chairman and CIO.  Steve authors a free weekly e-letter entitled, “On My Radar.”  Steve shares his views on macroeconomic research, valuations, portfolio construction, asset allocation and risk management.

The objective of the letter is to provide our investment advisors clients and professional investment managers with unique and relevant information that can be incorporated into their investment process to enhance performance and client communication.

Click here to receive his free weekly e-letter.

Social Media Links:

CMG is committed to setting a high standard for ETF strategists.  And we’re passionate about educating advisors and investors about tactical investing.  We launched CMG AdvisorCentral a year ago to share our knowledge of tactical investing and managing a successful advisory practice.

You can sign up for weekly updates to AdvisorCentral here.  If you’re looking for the CMG white paper, “Understanding Tactical Investment Strategies,” you can find that here.

AdvisorCentral is being updated with new educational resources we look forward to sharing with you. You can always connect with CMG on Twitter at @askcmg and follow our LinkedIn Showcase page devoted to tactical investing.

A Note on Investment Process:

From an investment management perspective, I’ve followed, managed and written about trend following and investor sentiment for many years.  I find that reviewing various sentiment, trend and other historically valuable rules-based indicators each week helps me to stay balanced and disciplined in allocating to the various risk sets that are included within a broadly diversified total portfolio solution.

My objective is to position in line with the equity and fixed income market’s primary trends.  I believe risk management is paramount in a long-term investment process.  When to hedge, when to become more aggressive, etc.

---

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Investing involves risk.  Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk.  Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc. or any of its related entities (collectively “CMG”) will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.  References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.

Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions.  Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing.  To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing.  CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.

This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities.  Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends.  The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client.  CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods.  See in links provided citing limitations of hypothetical back-tested information.  Past performance cannot predict or guarantee future performance.  Not a recommendation to buy or sell.  Please talk to your advisor.

Information herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its accuracy. This document is a general communication and is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only. None of the content should be viewed as a suggestion that you take or refrain from taking any action nor as a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, or other such purpose.

In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed income securities generally declines and conversely, in a falling interest rate environment, the value of fixed income securities generally increases. High-yield securities may be subject to heightened market, interest rate or credit risk and should not be purchased solely because of the stated yield. Ratings are measured on a scale that ranges from AAA or Aaa (highest) to D or C (lowest). Investment-grade investments are those rated from highest down to BBB- or Baa3.

NOT FDIC INSURED. MAY LOSE VALUE. NO BANK GUARANTEE.

Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.

In the event that there has been a change in an individual’s investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professional.

Written Disclosure Statement.  CMG is an SEC-registered investment adviser located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.  Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG’s founder and CEO.  Please note:  The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy.  A copy of CMG’s current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG’s internet web site at www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures.  CMG is committed to protecting your personal information.  Click here to review CMG’s privacy policies.